Prosopis juliflora, aka “veli kathan” or “seemai karuvel” in
Tamil, is a thorny plant that was propagated by the Government of India in
1960’s for its use as firewood. This plant is aggressive, fast-growing, shade and
fodder-giving. There was a recent ban on this plant by the Madras High Court.
When this was in the news, I was wondering how we, as a species, could ban
another species. Moral implications aside, there are practical issues behind
banning something that can propagate by wind and survive in difficult
conditions. Thanks to many environmentalists who appealed on behalf of this
plant, the ban is now lifted. Here are our observations of this plant.
The picture above is one of the many circles that have
formed “naturally” on our farm. These circles have a lot of neem, muddy (Morinda
pubescens), Ziziphus mauritiana, Albizzia lebbeck, Leucena
leucacephala, date palm, vines and ground cover.
I will walk you
through the chronology of events behind these five year old poly-culture areas.
- until 2013, huge Prosopis trees were growing here. Shepherds used to bring in their cattle for grazing every day and have their cattle rest in the shade of these trees.
- we bought our land in 2013, and fenced it off primarily to stop grazing.
- we did no maintenance of these areas – Prosopis was thriving. We used to see birds nesting there.
- I had heard stories that Prosopis wouldn’t let any other plant survive under its shade. But what I saw, in the following years, was quite the opposite. There were many neem and muddy under the big Prosopis. These native plants were slender, trying to grow in between the branches of Prosopis.
- In 2016, I decided to get the thorny trees cleared one by one, to make way for the more useful trees that were growing under them. Each Prosopis was cut down manually with great care, one person working two or three man days. The dug up soil was crumbly and rich in humus. Every Prosopis that we brought down had been instrumental in creating a big stand of trees.
I don’t believe that these Prosopis-created-poly-cultures on our farm are accidents or anomalies. My theory is that thorny Prosopis
houses birds by providing a safe place for their nests. Birds bring in seeds. Also, this plant’s
widespread branches can trap seeds that are dispersed by the wind. Because of the moderate temperature in its shade, young seedlings stand a better chance there as opposed to germinating in a barren area exposed to the blazing heat. If there are
no cattle to chew off the new under growth, soon we should see hardy, native
varieties grow there.
To think that we could ban a plant and be successful at it
is quite naive. When the ban was in place, the local JCBs were working round
the clock – burning precious fossil fuel and helping the rich JCB owners get
richer. A year after the work, I see well-coppiced Prosopis growing more
vigorously than ever before.
Sure enough, Prosopis is not the best plant to have around. But it is
certainly better than having a barren piece of land – because it provides
shade, fodder and habitat. There is a pressing need to understand the tragedy
of the commons (grazing areas), work with shepherds and aggressively plant
native trees at the right time of the year. All these measures combined can
help us reclaim our land. Until then Prosopis will rule.
-- Hema
Nice observations, Hema! I particularly am amazed at the growth of the multi- species circles/groves on your land! Kishore Chandra
ReplyDeleteThe way those trees fare in the company of the others is worth observing, I believe!
Observed similar growth of native species whose seeds we had scattered in pudukottai - protected by prosopis from grazers and firewood collectors. We too had to employ men at great cost to cut them and jcbs at greater cost to uproot them. Maybe it’s worthwhile looking at alternative strategies. Once the native plants grow tall and provide shade what happens to prosopis?
ReplyDeleteAs far as banning a species is concerned, it is an exotic that was brought in short sightedly, so the ban should be on such thinking. After all many other species could also have been planted that would have held the soil and provided nitrogen at no or little cost to society.
ReplyDeleteTrue. Your reasoning is practical and true. We are a homeschooling family near Pollachi. We brought our small farmland 9 years back. We have a short thorny tree. Many small birds, squirrels and bees live there. Creeper and climber plants naturally sprout near it and thrive on its support. I have no doubt about the benefit of retaining thorny trees.
ReplyDelete